Wait for court of law’s verdict before passing judgment

I would like to preempt the inevitable controversy that will surround the alleged Pi Kappa Alpha rape incident. I would also like to preface by saying that I am in no way, shape, or form affiliated with the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity nor the alleged victim.

As of this writing, no information is known of the alleged rapist’s identity nor of the alleged victim (per privacy laws of course). All that has been reported is the action of an alleged rape at the fraternity house.

“Alleged” is the key word in the entirety of this situation. It is simply human and natural to jump to a conclusion regarding the situation. This thought process is especially easy when Pike’s recent hazing allegation is also considered. Again, the key word here is allegation as no claims have yet been proven.

Neutrality is essential. I am in no way defending the act of rape, nor am I doubting the honesty of the alleged victim. But before a judgment should be made in the court of public opinion, a court of law must have the final say.

I need only to remind readers of the Duke lacrosse rape scandal only a few years ago. The public all but sentenced the accused – resulting in a suspension of their season as well as the defamation of their character and reputations.

This accusation very well may be proven true, but we cannot know until or if (since the initial report states that the alleged victim will not file charges) a verdict is handed down. Let us hope that the university community can maintain a level head that will ensure everyone’s right to due process.

Will Burgess
Freshman, Woodstock
Political science